12 17 24 7 |
High risk vulnerabilities found. Medium risk vulnerabilities found. Low risk vulnerabilities found. New vulnerabilities found. |
7 4 1 12 7 |
Hosts (37%) had
high risk vulnerabilities. Hosts (21%) had medium risk vulnerabilities. Hosts (5%) had low risk vulnerabilities. Hosts (63%) had vulnerabilities. Hosts (37%) had no vulnerabilities. |
Scan Type Start Date End Date Hosts Scanned New Hosts |
Enterprise 13-Apr-03 11:30 13-Apr-03 16:43 19 1 |
|---|
| Key |
Increase |
No change |
Decrease |
High Risk | Medium Risk | Low Risk | None Found |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10264 | SNMP Default Community Names |
3 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | The SNMP agent on the remote host uses one or more default or easily guessable community strings. This enables an attacker to extract a lot of useful information, and possibly make configuration changes to the server. A sample of the information that can be extracted:
[For specific url or description click server link below.] |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Change the community strings to something unguessable | ||||
| References | CAN-1999-0517 CAN-1999-0254 CAN-1999-0516 CAN-1999-0186 | ||||
| Servers | dns0.example.com (192.168.0.110) [Feb 2003] |
www.your_company.fr (192.168.0.105)
|
|---|---|---|
| www.your_company.nl (192.168.0.103) [Jul 2002] |
Vulnerability
|
10481 | Unpassworded MySQL |
1 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | The MySQL server has no password allowing remote users to execute arbitrary SQL as the databases admin user. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Add a password or restrict access to the port trusted hosts. | ||||
| Servers | sql1.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.52) [Apr 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10605 | BIND < 8.2.3 TSIG Overflow |
1 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its version number, the remote BIND server contains a vulnerability in its transaction signature (TSIG) code. A remote attacker with no authentication can use this to crash the server, and execute arbitrary code with the same permissions as the name service. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to an unaffected version, or apply a patch. | ||||
| References | CVE-2001-0010 CVE-2001-0011 CVE-2001-0013 CVE-2001-0012 | ||||
| Servers | dns0.example.com (192.168.0.110) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11030 | Apache < 1.3.25 Chunked Encoding Vulnerability |
1 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote host is running a version of Apache that is older than 1.3.25 or 2.0.37. This version is vulnerable to a buffer overflow, which can crash the server. Remote users with no special permissions may be able to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the web server. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to an unaffected version | ||||
| References | CVE-2002-0392 Apache Security Alert CERT Advisory CA-2002-17 | ||||
| Servers | www.example.com (192.168.0.112) [Oct 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11039 | mod_ssl < 2.8.10 off by one Vulnerability |
1 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote host is using a version of mod_ssl which is older than 2.8.10. This version is vulnerable to an "off by one" buffer overflow. Remote users with no special privileges can use this to crash the server. Users who also have write access to .htaccess files may be able to execute abritrary code with the permissions of the web server. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to version 2.8.10 or newer | ||||
| References | CVE-2002-0653 Securiteam advisory | ||||
| Servers | www.example.com (192.168.0.112) [Oct 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11299 | MySQL < 3.23.55 Double Free |
1 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner, the MySQL service on this host is vulnerable to a double free bug. This allows a remote attacker with a valid login to crash the server, and may allow them to execute arbitrary commands as the owner of the process. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to 3.23.55 or newer, or apply a patch | ||||
| References | CAN-2003-0150 CVE-2003-0073 | ||||
| Servers | sql2.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.53) [Nov 0002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11316 | Sendmail < 8.12.8 Header Buffer Overflow |
1 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner, the remote sendmail server is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in its header parsing code. This allows remote users to crash the service, and may allow them to execute arbitrary commands as the owner of the sendmail process, usually root. It may also be vulnerable to a flaw in smrsh which allows local users to escalate their privileges. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to 8.12.8 or newer, or apply a patch | ||||
| References | CVE-2001-1349 CVE-2002-1337 CAN-2002-1165 | ||||
| Servers | mail.example.com (192.168.0.111) [Nov 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11378 | MySQL < 3.23.56 Privilege Escalation |
2 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner, this MySQL server is running a version older than 3.23.56. This allows any database user (local or remote) to overwrite arbitrary files using "SELECT INTO OUTFILE". This can be used to overwrite configuration files and hence escalate privileges. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to an unaffected version, or apply a patch. | ||||
| References | CAN-2003-0150 | ||||
| Servers | sql1.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.52) [Mar 2002] | sql2.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.53) [Dec 0002] |
|---|---|---|
Vulnerability
|
11424 | IIS WebDAV Buffer Overrun |
1 Servers
|
High Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote web server is an IIS server running WebDAV. This may be vulnerable to a buffer overrun when a malicious WebDAV request is sent. When running on an unpatched Windows 2000 server, a remote attacker with no authentication could use this to crash the server and execute arbitrary code. Note: This may be a false positive as it is not possible to determine remotely if the patch has been applied. |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Apply the patch from Microsoft. In addition we suggest you edit registry to disable WebDAV, following these instructions. If you do not disable WebDAV then this vulnerability will continue appearing until you stoplist it. | ||||
| References | Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-007 CAN-2003-0109 CERT Advisory CA-2003-09 | ||||
| Servers | www.your_company.nl (192.168.0.103) [May 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10249 | SMTP Server Allows VRFY/EXPN |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote SMTP server allows the VRFY and/or EXPN commands. These can be used to check the validity of accounts, find the delivery address of mail aliases, or even determine the full name of a recipient. An attacker could use this information to focus their attacks, or aid social engineering. This leakage is unnecessary so you should turn off these commands. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | If you are using sendmail, add the configuration directive 'PrivacyOptions=goaway'. For other mail daemons, consult the documentation. | ||||
| References | CAN-1999-0531 | ||||
| Servers | mail.example.com (192.168.0.111) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10539 | Useable Remote Name Server |
2 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote name server allows recursive queries to be performed by one of our test machines. This allows anyone to use it to resolve third parties names. Remote users can also extract information about your name lookup patterns, and may be able to perform DNS cache poisoning attacks. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Restrict recursive queries to trusted addresses. For servers running BIND, use the allow-recursion or allow-query directives. | ||||
| References | CVE-1999-0024 | ||||
| Servers |
www.your_company.fr (192.168.0.105)
|
www.yourcompany.net (192.168.0.102) [May 2002] |
|---|---|---|
Vulnerability
|
10595 | DNS Zone Transfer |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote name server allows DNS zone transfers to be performed. This information can be of great use to an attacker trying to learn the topology of your network. This configuration may be intentional, but it's usual practice to restrict zone transfers. Here is a sample of the data that can be extracted:
[For specific url or description click server link below.] |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Restrict zone transfers to trusted addresses, usually just your slave name servers | ||||
| References | CAN-1999-0532 | ||||
| Servers | dns0.example.com (192.168.0.110) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10629 | Lotus Domino Anonymous Database Access |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | We were able to read the following Domino databases from the web server, without any authentication:
[For specific url or description click server link below.]
This usually represents a security risk as the information contained is accessible to anyone on the internet.
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Reconfigure Domino to require authentication for these databases. | ||||
| References | CAN-2002-0664 CAN-2000-0021 | ||||
| Servers | www.yourcompany.com.my (192.168.0.106) [Feb 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10661 | .printer ISAPI Filter Enabled |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote IIS server has the .printer (Internet Printing Protocol) filter enabled. At least one remote vulnerability has been discovered in this filter. To avoid crashing your server, we have not directly tested for the vulnerability and this may not be a real hole. However, as the filter is not usually required, you should turn it off as a matter of good practice. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | If you don't require this filter, disable it. If it is required, make sure the latest patches are applied. | ||||
| References | Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-023 CVE-2001-0241 | ||||
| Servers | www.your_company.nl (192.168.0.103) [Feb 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10809 | Sendmail -bt option |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner, the remote sendmail server may be vulnerable to the -bt overflow attack which allows any local user to execute arbitrary commands as root. Note: This vulnerability is local only |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to an unaffected version, or apply a patch. | ||||
| Servers | mail.example.com (192.168.0.111) [Feb 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10815 | Web Server Cross Site Scripting |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote web server appears to be vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. Certain error or redirect pages include the requested URL, and special characters are not escaped. The vulnerability allows an attacker to insert their own JavaScript/HTML code, which will run at the same trust level as the server. This may enable them to steal session cookies, form details, etc. The cause of this may either be bugs in your webserver software, or errors in your dynamic pages and configuration e.g custom error pages. An example of a URL which causes such an attack is:
[For specific url or description click server link below.]
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Either fix your dynamic pages and configuration, or upgrade your web server to an unaffected version. Patches : Allaire/Macromedia Jrun, Allaire/Macromedia, Microsoft IIS, Apache, ColdFusion |
||||
| References | General Info XSS Anatomy CERT Advisory CA-2000-02 CVE-2002-1060 | ||||
| Servers | www.yourcompany.net (192.168.0.102) [Dec 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10991 | IIS global.asa Accessible |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | This web server allows retrieval of the /global.asa
file, which may contain sensitive information such as database passwords, physical paths and configuration options. This vulnerability may be caused by a missing ISAPI map of the .asa extension to asp.dll. A sample of your global.asa file:
[For specific url or description click server link below.] |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Restore the .asa map | ||||
| Servers | www.your_company.nl (192.168.0.103) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11137 | Apache < 1.3.27 multiple vulnerablities |
2 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner, the remote web server is running a version of Apache older than 1.3.27. This contains a cross site scripting flaw through the Host: header, if UseCanonicalName is Off. There is also a buffer overrun in the ApacheBench module - if this is enabled, it may allow arbitrary code execution. A further vulnerability exists in the shared memory scoreboard, but this is only exploitable by a local user. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to 1.3.27 or higher. Workaround : Set UseCanonicalName to On and disable ApacheBench |
||||
| References | CAN-2002-0839 CVE-2002-0840 CAN-2002-0843 | ||||
| Servers | www.example.com (192.168.0.112) [Oct 2002] | www.yourcompany.co.uk (192.168.0.100) [Nov 2002] |
|---|---|---|
Vulnerability
|
11574 | Portable OpenSSH PAM timing attack |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | When using PAM for authentication versions of portable OpenSSH < 3.6.1p2 are vulnerable to a timing attack. This attack allows a remote user to brute force passwords. Note: it is not possible to remotely determine if PAM is in use, so this may be a false positive. |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to a non-affected version. | ||||
| References | CAN-2003-0190 CAN-2003-0190 | ||||
| Servers | mail.example.com (192.168.0.111) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11718 | Lotus Domino Database Lock DoS |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner, this host is running a vulnerable version of Lotus Domino. It is possible to lock out some databases by requesting them through the web interface with a carefully crafted URL. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to an unaffected version, or apply a patch. | ||||
| References | CVE-2001-0954 | ||||
| Servers | www.yourcompany.com.my (192.168.0.106) [Jan 0003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11842 | MySQL < 3.23.58, 4.0.15 Password Overflow |
2 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | You are running a version of MySQL which is older than version 4.0.15. This contains a buffer overflow flaw in the password handling code. Any user who has credentials to connect to this server can change their password to a carefully crafted overly long value, and execute arbitrary code with the priviliges of the database user. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to MySQL 3.23.58 or 4.0.15 | ||||
| References | CAN-2003-0780 | ||||
| Servers | sql1.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.52) [Mar 2002] | sql2.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.53) [Feb 2003] |
|---|---|---|
Vulnerability
|
12110 | OpenSSL < 0.9.6j, 0.9.7d Denial of Service |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner, the remote OpenSSL service is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. A remote attacker with no authentication can crash the service by conducting a deliberately invalid SSL/TLS handshake. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to OpenSSL 0.9.6j or 0.9.7d to apply a patch. | ||||
| References | CAN-2004-0081 CAN-2004-0112 Bugtraq 9899 CAN-2004-0079 | ||||
| Servers | apollo.example.com (192.168.0.81) [Dec 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
12280 | Apache < 1.3.31, 2.0.49 Connection Blocking DoS |
1 Servers
|
Medium Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote host is running a version of Apache that is older than 1.3.31 or 2.0.49. This version is vulnerable to a denial of service attack where a remote attacker can block new connections to the server by connecting to a listening socket on a rarely accessed port. This version also vulnerable to an input validation error that may allow escape character sequences to be injected into apache log files. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to Apache 1.3.31 or 2.0.49 or newer | ||||
| References | CVE-2003-0020 Buqtraq_9921 CAN-2004-0174 Buqtraq_9930 | ||||
| Servers | www.example.com (192.168.0.112) [Feb 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10028 | BIND Version Information Leakage |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | It is possible to determine the remote name server's type and version by issuing this query: dig version.bind. txt chaos @server An attacker can use this information to focus their attack strategy. |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Use the "version" configuration directive to change this to "unknown" | ||||
| Servers | dns0.example.com (192.168.0.110) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10077 | Microsoft Frontpage Extensions Installed |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote web server appears to be running the Microsoft Frontpage extensions. These have had a history of insecurity, so you should carefully check that you have the latest patches applied. It is also common for Frontpage extentions to be insecure because they are misconfigured. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | If you do not require FP extensions, disable them. If they are required, make sure the latest patches are applied. | ||||
| References | CAN-2000-0114 Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-018 Microsoft Knowledge Base Q813380 Microsoft Knowledge Base Q813379 | ||||
| Servers | www.your_company.nl (192.168.0.103) [May 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10092 | FTP Server type and version detected |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote FTP server reveals its type and version in the banner, or in response to SYST. This gives potential attackers additional information about the system, which may help them choose an effective strategy. Versions and types should be omitted where possible. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Change the login banner to something generic. | ||||
| Servers |
www.example.com (192.168.0.112)
|
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10114 | Host Responded to ICMP Timestamp Request |
3 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | The target host responded to an ICMP timestamp request. This allows an attacker to determine the exact time and date set on your server. This information could be used in attacks against time-based authentication protocols. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Either disable timestamp replies, or filter them at your firewall. | ||||
| References | CAN-1999-0524 | ||||
| Servers |
dns0.example.com (192.168.0.110)
|
mail.example.com (192.168.0.111)
|
|---|---|---|
www.your_company.nl (192.168.0.103)
|
Vulnerability
|
10622 | PPTP Information Leakage |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | The host appears to be running a PPTP (VPN) service. In it's default configuration, the PPTP service leaks information such as hostname and PPTP version number. An attacker can use this information to focus their attack strategy. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Replace the version strings with "unknown" | ||||
| Servers | www.yourcompany.com.my (192.168.0.106) [Feb 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10719 | MySQL Server version |
2 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote MySQL service reveals its version number. This information may help an attacker choose an effective strategy. Versions should be omitted where possible. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Change the version number to something generic | ||||
| Servers | sql1.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.52) [Mar 2002] | sql2.manc.yourcompany.com (192.168.1.53) [Feb 2003] |
|---|---|---|
Vulnerability
|
10759 | Private IP Address Leakage |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote web server returned headers containing an RFC 1918 private IP address. This exposes an internal IP address that would usually be masked by a proxy or NAT firewall. The information may be useful to an attacker trying to remotely map your network. The private IP address is: [For specific url or description click server link below.] |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | For IIS issue "adsutil set w3svc/UseHostName True" and restart | ||||
| References | Bugtraq ID 1499 CAN-2000-0649 Microsoft Knowledge Base Q218180 | ||||
| Servers | www.yourcompany.co.uk (192.168.0.100) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10766 | Apache UserDir information leak |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | An information leak occurs on Apache based web servers whenever the UserDir module is enabled. A request to a non-existant user (e.g. http://server.com/~notauser/) returns a 404 code. A similar request to a user with no web page returns a 403 code. This allows an attacker to determine which user accounts exist. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | mod_rewrite provides a way to get the UserDir functionality without the leak | ||||
| References | SecuriTeam advisory CAN-2001-1013 | ||||
| Servers | apollo.example.com (192.168.0.81) [Dec 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
10882 | SSH Protocol Version 1 Enabled |
2 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | The remote SSH daemon allows connections using version 1.33 or 1.5 of the SSH protocol. These protocols are not completely cryptographically safe so they should not be used. They allow a passive eavesdropper to extract information, including the lengths of passwords and commands, and the ciphers being used. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | OpenSSH : Set the 'Protocol' option to '2' SSH.com : Set the 'Ssh1Compatibility' option to 'no' |
||||
| References | CAN-2001-0572 | ||||
| Servers | mail.example.com (192.168.0.111) [Nov 2002] | www.yourcompany.net (192.168.0.102) [Jan 2003] |
|---|---|---|
Vulnerability
|
10884 | NTP Information Leakage |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | It is possible to determine various details about the remote host by querying the NTP variables. This includes the OS, upstream NTP server and detailed clock information. An attacker can use this information to focus their attack strategy. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Use a firewall to restrict NTP to trusted addresses, or configure ntpd to ignore info packets. | ||||
| Servers |
www.yourcompany.com (192.168.0.101)
|
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11213 | Webserver Supports TRACE or TRACK Methods |
3 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | Your webserver supports the TRACE and/or TRACK methods. These increase the exploitability of any cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that may exist in your site. As they are primarily intended for debugging, they can be turned off without reduction of service. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Disable these methods on production servers IIS : Use the IIS Lockdown Wizard Apache : Use mod_rewrite to redirect unallowed verbs to the forbidden target |
||||
| References | WhiteHat Advisory CERT VU#867593 | ||||
| Servers | www.example.com (192.168.0.112) [Mar 2003] | www.yourcompany.co.uk (192.168.0.100) [May 2002] |
|---|---|---|
| www.yourcompany.net (192.168.0.102) [Dec 2002] |
Vulnerability
|
11229 | Script Calling phpinfo() Detected |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | PHP contains a function called phpinfo() that dumps a significant amount of system and configuration information that may be useful to an attacker. An unprotected script that calls this function has been detected. You can see the information using the following URL:
[For specific url or description click server link below.]
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Remove this script, or protect it with some kind of authentication. | ||||
| Servers | apollo.example.com (192.168.0.81) [Dec 2002] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
11915 | Apache < 1.3.29 Multiple Local Flaws |
2 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | According to its banner (or an analysis of its behaviour), this web server is running a version of Apache earlier than 1.3.29. These contain buffer overruns in mod_alias and mod_rewrite, which can be exploited by a local user to escalate their privileges. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Upgrade to an unaffected version, or apply a patch. | ||||
| References | Bugtraq CAN-2003-0542 | ||||
| Servers | www.example.com (192.168.0.112) [Jan 2003] | www.yourcompany.co.uk (192.168.0.100) [Nov 2002] |
|---|---|---|
Vulnerability
|
12217 | DNS Cache Snooping |
1 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | It is possible for remote attackers to see what domains have been queried through this nameserver, by issuing queries with the "no recursion" bit set. The server responds differently for hosts that have been recently resolved and are cached. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Restrict access to DNS caches to local users. | ||||
| References | SideStep | ||||
| Servers | www.yourcompany.net (192.168.0.102) [Mar 2003] |
|---|
Vulnerability
|
90001 | Holes Detected in Firewall Configuration |
3 Servers
|
Low Risk |
|---|
| Description | This host is protected by a firewall. Incoming TCP connections to most ports are blocked, however some ports were discovered where the firewall allows connections, but no service is running. This often indicates a firewall configuration error. The affected ports are: [For specific url or description click server link below.] |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solution | Reconfigure your firewall to block all ports that you are not running services on. | ||||
| References | Firewalls FAQ | ||||
| Servers | mail.example.com (192.168.0.111) [Mar 2003] | www.example.com (192.168.0.112) [Nov 2002] |
|---|---|---|
| www.your_company.nl (192.168.0.103) [Mar 2003] |